Sexy chat masnger - Carbon 14 dating flawed

And finally, they count all of the tree-rings, using the matching patterns to connect all the pieces, and they determine the age of the oldest piece of wood.This is called a "long chronology." By dating the oldest piece of wood using the Carbon dating method and comparing the two dates, scientists can make the necessary adjustments to their calculations. Aardsma, "Myths Regarding Radiocarbon Dating," Impact, No.

carbon 14 dating flawed-20

This is because there is remnant C14 radiation in the measuring instrument, and indeed the very measurement process itself introduces a very tiny amount of C14 in the process.

This is what is called "instrument background" - a tiny value that must be subtracted (if significant to the overall measurement) from the measurement value in order to derive a "date estimate" of the specimen.

What many do not realize is that carbon dating is not used to date dinosaurs. Carbon dating is only accurate back a few thousand years.

So if scientists believe that a creature lived millions of years ago, then they would need to date it another way. They assume dinosaurs lived millions of years ago (instead of thousands of years ago like the bible says).

Advocates of the Carbon dating method have turned to "Dendrochronology" (a.k.a.

tree-ring dating) to calibrate their timescale (that is, to adjust it to compensate for the C-12 to C-14 ratio fluctuations).Carbon Dating - Dendrochronology As we've already seen, in order for Carbon dating to work we need to know what the C-12 to C-14 ratio was at the time of a specimen's death.If the ratio has fluctuated throughout the unobservable past (and we can be sure that it has), how can we determine what the ratio was during the lifetime of a specimen that lived and died before we first began measuring the ratio?The vast majority of young earth creationists are oblivious to all of this - and those handful of young earth creationists who even have a clue about any of it prove over and over again in their writing that they don't know how to deal with the details competently.Indeed, this is why no young earth creationist has ever published any scientific research article on the topic in any professional science journal of physics or geophysics or archaeology or paleontology anywhere on the planet.(In regard to the so-called C14 dating of diamonds that young earth creationists love to use, it is this instrument background that we're actually talking about, and indeed the young earth creationists who employ this argument are demonstrating that they have never even read the scientific research articles about running diamonds through the AMS instruments and C14 dating process, because the articles themselves clearly and explicitly explain and describe exactly what the scientists were measuring and why they were doing it, which is why they were using diamonds in the first place.

Tags: , ,